Table of Contents
The debate on extending overtime in hockey: Players weigh in
In the world of hockey, the thrill of overtime can be electrifying, but recent discussions among players have sparked a heated debate about whether the NHL should consider extending the overtime period.
Following the opening game of the 4 Nations Face-Off, where a new 10-minute overtime format was introduced, players have expressed a range of opinions on the potential for a longer overtime in the regular season.
Mixed reactions from players
While some players, like Zach Werenski, are open to the idea of a longer overtime, others, such as Nathan MacKinnon, have voiced concerns about the physical toll it could take. MacKinnon, who described feeling completely exhausted during the extra period of Canada’s 4-3 overtime victory over Sweden, highlighted the challenges players face when the game extends beyond regulation time.
“It takes a lot out of you,” he noted, suggesting that while he might be open to a seven-minute overtime, the current format has its merits.
The allure of a longer overtime
Connor McDavid, a star player for the Edmonton Oilers, expressed a more positive outlook on the new overtime format.
He believes that extending the overtime period could reduce the likelihood of games ending in a shootout, which many players and fans find less appealing. “I think it’s a good little trial run to see how it works,” McDavid stated, emphasizing the excitement that comes with three-on-three hockey and the skill displayed by talented players on the ice.
Concerns about player fatigue
Despite the enthusiasm for a longer overtime, players like Aleksander Barkov raised valid concerns about player fatigue. Barkov mentioned that while shootouts can be entertaining, the intensity of three-on-three hockey showcases the skills of the players and is a thrilling spectacle for fans.
However, he cautioned that extending overtime could lead to increased fatigue over the course of an 82-game season. “If you just keep adding longer and longer overtimes, I don’t know how guys would take it,” he said, highlighting the need for balance between excitement and player health.
Potential solutions for player wellness
One suggestion that emerged during the discussions was the idea of adjusting TV timeouts and intermission breaks to help manage player fatigue if overtime were to be extended. By adding 30 seconds to TV timeouts while reducing intermission breaks by a minute, teams could potentially keep players fresher during longer overtime periods. However, this could also lead to coaches utilizing their top players more frequently, which might counteract the intended benefits.
As the NHL continues to explore the possibility of extending overtime, the opinions of players will play a crucial role in shaping the future of the game. Whether it’s a longer overtime period or adjustments to existing rules, the goal remains the same: to enhance the excitement of hockey while ensuring the well-being of its players.
