Table of Contents
The complex identity of Ameen Cohen: A case of deception and justice
Ameen Cohen, a 37-year-old banking professional residing in Thornhill, Ontario, presents a perplexing case that raises questions about identity, legality, and national security. Initially arriving in Canada under the name Amin Yousefijam, he has undergone multiple name changes, including a legal transformation to Ameen Cohen in 2022.
This transformation, however, is not merely a personal choice; it is intertwined with a troubling past involving allegations of evading international sanctions against Iran.
Unveiling a hidden past
During a recent deportation hearing, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) revealed that Cohen had previously been known as Amin Riki and had served as a police lieutenant in Tehran.
His name changes raise suspicions about his intentions, particularly as he faces accusations of participating in a scheme to illegally ship sensitive equipment to Iran. This activity is seen as a direct threat to Canada’s national security, as it undermines efforts to contain the Iranian regime’s influence and potential for terrorism.
The legal implications of identity changes
The case of Ameen Cohen highlights a significant loophole in Canada’s name change system. After his conviction in the U.S. for sanctions violations, he applied to change his name, allegedly without disclosing his criminal history.
This has sparked a debate about the integrity of the legal system and whether individuals can exploit name changes to evade justice. The Ontario government has acknowledged the need to review its policies to prevent serious offenders from concealing their identities.
A family affair: The role of kinship in crime
Cohen’s involvement in the sanctions conspiracy is reportedly linked to his brother, Arash Yousefijam, who is also facing legal repercussions. Cohen claims he was merely assisting his brother, viewing it as a familial obligation.
However, this raises further questions about the extent of their collaboration and the implications for national security. The CBSA’s argument that Cohen’s actions contribute to an increased threat of terrorism in Canada cannot be overlooked, especially in light of the Iranian regime’s history of supporting militant groups.
The broader context of Iranian influence in Canada
This case unfolds against a backdrop of heightened scrutiny of Iranian officials residing in Canada. Following the regime’s violent suppression of protests in 2022, the Canadian government has taken steps to deport individuals linked to the Iranian government. The CBSA has identified several alleged senior officials living in Canada, and the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) is tasked with determining their fates. The implications of these cases extend beyond individual circumstances, reflecting a broader concern about the Iranian regime’s influence within Canadian borders.
As the IRB prepares to rule on Cohen’s deportation, the case serves as a critical reminder of the complexities surrounding identity, legality, and national security in an increasingly interconnected world. The outcome will not only affect Cohen’s future but also set a precedent for how Canada addresses similar cases in the future.
