Table of Contents
Remote governance in a globalized world
In an era where remote work has become the norm, the decision of John McDougall, chair of the Edmonton Police Commission, to complete his term from Portugal has ignited a heated debate. McDougall, who has been living in Portugal for about two weeks, asserts that his geographical location will not hinder his ability to fulfill his responsibilities.
He emphasizes that he remains committed to the city and the commission’s work, despite the distance.
“Just because I stepped on an airplane doesn’t mean I have severed all of my ties with the city,” McDougall stated in a recent interview.
His term as chair concludes on December 31, but he plans to continue serving as a commissioner until 2026, when his appointment ends. This situation raises important questions about the effectiveness of remote governance, particularly in roles that require direct engagement with the community.
Concerns from legal professionals
However, not everyone shares McDougall’s confidence in remote participation. Tom Engel, chair of the policing committee for the Criminal Trial Lawyers’ Association, expressed his disapproval, labeling the arrangement as “unacceptable.” Engel argues that virtual meetings cannot replace the nuances of in-person interactions, especially when dealing with sensitive community issues.
“You lose an awful lot not being there in person,” he remarked, highlighting the importance of physical presence in fostering trust and understanding within the community.
Engel’s concerns reflect a broader skepticism about the efficacy of remote governance. While technology has enabled many to work from anywhere, the question remains: can one truly represent a community while physically absent? Engel believes that being on the ground is crucial for staying informed about local issues and maintaining a connection with citizens and police officers alike.
The evolving landscape of public service
Despite the pushback, McDougall maintains that his remote service is not only feasible but also in line with current practices. He pointed out that other commissioners have participated remotely throughout the year, utilizing platforms like Zoom to stay engaged.
“There’s nothing in the Police Act that says I cannot serve while not being a citizen of Edmonton,” he argued, reinforcing his belief that technology can bridge the gap created by distance.
Moreover, McDougall has assured the public that he will return to Edmonton for significant events requiring physical presence. His commitment to the commission and the community remains steadfast, as he aims to balance his personal life with his public duties. As the landscape of public service continues to evolve, McDougall’s situation may serve as a case study for future governance models in an increasingly globalized world.
