Table of Contents
Funding cuts leave advocacy groups in disbelief
In a surprising move, three disability advocacy organizations in Alberta have expressed their shock and sadness over the provincial government’s decision to terminate their funding contracts more than a year ahead of schedule.
The groups, located in Edmonton, Calgary, and Lethbridge, play a crucial role in supporting individuals with intellectual and physical disabilities by connecting them with peers and helping them develop essential self-advocacy skills.
The Southern Alberta Individual Planning Association, based in Lethbridge, the Disability Action Hall in Calgary, and the Self Advocacy Federation in Edmonton have been instrumental in providing support to vulnerable communities.
Together, they receive less than $424,000 annually, a sum that has now been cut 15 months prematurely, leaving them scrambling to adjust their operations.
Government’s rationale for funding withdrawal
Keri McEachern, a facilitator with the Self Advocacy Federation, revealed that each organization had entered into a three-year funding contract with the government to cover their operational costs.
However, earlier this month, they were informed that funding would cease in April, well before the contracts were due to expire. This abrupt decision has raised questions about the government’s commitment to supporting disability advocacy.
The provincial government has stated that it intends to redirect resources to connect individuals living with disabilities to front-line services, claiming that the organizations in question do not provide such services.
However, McEachern strongly disagrees, asserting that these groups offer vital support within their communities, helping individuals navigate the complexities of living with disabilities.
Community impact and future implications
The implications of these funding cuts extend beyond the organizations themselves; they threaten the well-being of countless individuals who rely on these services.
As the groups work to advocate for their communities, the loss of funding could hinder their ability to provide essential resources and support. The decision has sparked a broader conversation about the importance of sustained funding for disability advocacy and the need for the government to recognize the value of these organizations in fostering independence and self-advocacy among individuals with disabilities.
As the situation develops, the affected groups are determined to continue their advocacy efforts and seek alternative funding sources. They emphasize the necessity of community support and awareness in ensuring that individuals with disabilities receive the assistance they need to thrive. The future of these organizations hangs in the balance, and their fight for funding is a testament to the resilience of the disability advocacy community in Alberta.
